For me, the extra pixels are more important due to the amount of adjustment I make in post. If you are going to shift a lot, I suggest the 60MP sensors are better as they have much less lenscast at a given shift. Hence, I went full-frame as soon as I could when the P65+ arrived, then went to Aptus 12 and now the IQ180. I tried other tech cams and chose the Alpa because it suited my needs best.Īs to format, for me size is everything. However, when it comes to architecture, my tool of choice is an IQ180 on an Alpa STC and I shoot over 80% of my work with an Alpa 23mm HR Alpagon (Rodie 23HR Digaron by another name).Īs I travel a lot and mostly shoot without an assistant, my gear has to be light and fast handling. I have been a photographer for many years and have lots of gear at my disposal. I make my living shooting architecture and construction in Europe, Asia and Australasia. All the answers posted are both correct and incorrect in different ways. In truth, there is no definitive answer to this question. It begs the question, under what circumstances, given what parameters and for what purpose and outcome? The OP's question is much like any other question asking for a 'best', be it best car, best engine, best powersaw, ect. I'm curious to know a little more about your experiences Dan. I'm looking around for an adapter plate so I can try my H3DII 22mp back on the Cambo. I've heard that in order to create a proper LCC your LCC file can't include the black outside the image circle. The Canon wasn't as sharp as I would have liked but it was the one I ultimately handed to the client. The file from the P45+ was unusable as Capture one could could not completely remove the colour cast. I've shot the same scene on a Cambo with a P45+ and Canon TSE 17mm. Ideally the Blad would have shift lenses that are as wide as the TSEs. My clients don't notice the difference between 35mm and MF but I do and despite the fact that my clients won't pay me any more if I shoot on a tech camera, if there was a satisfactory solution I would buy it. I tried the TSE 45mm 2 days ago and it has unsatisfactory CA. I owned a GX680 when I was still shooting film the 50mm lens was beautiful but the 65mm had way too much distortion. MF SHOULD be the perfect balance but there is no lens as wide as the TSE 17 that can be shifted. I love the feel and quality of a tech camera but the speed of a 35mm. I shoot professionally and have used the TSE lenses on a 5dMkII

Vintage 65mm tiltshift lens hartblei